Chatbot disclosure#A50-1-CHATBOT-DISCLOSURE
If people interact directly with an AI system (chatbot, voice agent), they must be informed they are dealing with AI — unless this is obvious to a reasonably well-informed person from the context.
A50Check assessments are generated against an encoded rulebook of the EU AI Act's Article 50 transparency obligations. Every requirement below cites the official passage it relies on — verbatim, with a deep link into the EUR-Lex consolidated text of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (AI Act). Paid deliverables are additionally human-reviewed before they are issued.
Rulebook encoding 0.1-draft — pending legal validation. General information, not legal advice.
If people interact directly with an AI system (chatbot, voice agent), they must be informed they are dealing with AI — unless this is obvious to a reasonably well-informed person from the context.
Providers of AI systems that generate synthetic audio, image, video or text must ensure outputs are marked in a machine-readable format and detectable as artificially generated or manipulated (e.g. watermarking, metadata, provenance standards), so far as technically feasible.
Organisations using emotion recognition or biometric categorisation systems must inform the people exposed to them, and process personal data in line with EU data protection law.
AI-generated or manipulated images, audio or video that depict real or plausibly real persons, places, objects or events — and could misleadingly appear authentic — must be visibly disclosed as artificially generated or manipulated.
AI-generated or manipulated text published to inform the public on matters of public interest must be disclosed as artificially generated — unless the content has undergone human review or editorial control and a natural or legal person holds editorial responsibility for it.
All Article 50 disclosures must be provided in a clear and distinguishable manner, at the latest at the time of first interaction or exposure, and meet applicable accessibility requirements.
Content published before 2026-08-02 does not need retrospective labelling. However, republishing, substantially modifying, or reusing archived AI content in a new campaign or commercial context after that date triggers the labelling obligation afresh.
Organisations must know where AI generates or alters anything they publish — website imagery, social posts, chatbots, marketing copy, reports — and determine which obligations attach to each, including whether they act as provider, deployer, or both.